我們叫他M&M好了
吃飯過沒多久,問完了正常人問的問題之後
我問他 "你覺得sin是什麼"
因為昨天去上bible study就在討論這個問題
而M&M先生本身也是Christian, 所以他的回答和我的Bible先生蠻類似的
都是近乎 "the failure of God's expectation and etc."
sin這字的根本意思似乎是 "failure to hit the mark."
and the topic as we were talking and eating was somehow, but not accidentally, brought into his proof-of-God theory.
He argued that all the reasoning methodology I have learned was principal to the God, the creator of everything because reasoning method I am using is
built upon the consistency rules, harmony, the tradition. When I am making an argument, I am already, unawarely, using the logics that is built upon the Christian world because the founder of the ability and everything that is around us is God.
Making an argument using rational thinking to challenge the existence of God and his credibility is as if one is trying to take the sword from the enemy's hand in hope it to become his own weapon.
(Principal to the God means that everything that happens, including I am being here answering and asking him questions, account for the existence of the God. )
God, according to Mr. M&M, is the founder of all these. One of the strongest argument he has made for me to challenge the existence of Christian's God and his Christian belief.
"If there's no one who is controlling all the harmony of the world, the universe, who is?" said he.
I threw him questions such as "how do you verify that the Christian's God is the God though?"
"how do you know that is someone, not something, in charge of controlling the harmony of everything though?"
I think the most fundamental presumption (such word I considered to be in an even earlier stage than assumption) M&M is making is
the existence of the God. I pointed that out and he answered me with wit and strong reasoning, "you can't make judgement without making any presumption."
"All your 'rational' thinking, your belief, is built upon what you have learned from the past," replied M&M.
Don't bother if you don't know understand what I said due to this specific blog I wrote is not well-written, full of grammatical mistakes, misspelling, wrong word usage, incomplete and discrete arguments, vague explanations, and etc.
but I just want to say that it's lucky to be a Christian...
or lucky for one who believes reverently in religions.
不過Christian的這個preassumption真他媽的囂張
"In order to ask me questions, you have to believe in Christianity first," said he.
當然不是照字面上的意思翻
聊這玩意的時候讓我想到佛教的禪和直指本心的那些 metaphysics,
我現在已經不知道自己再說什麼了
禪在M&M想法裡也是屬於他的神的範疇
畢竟根據我對禪粗淺的認識實在說不出太多東西
而當他問我說 "你是怎麼知道禪在說什麼",我就知道又掉進他那個大陷阱裡了
好厲害...
吃飯過沒多久,問完了正常人問的問題之後
我問他 "你覺得sin是什麼"
因為昨天去上bible study就在討論這個問題
而M&M先生本身也是Christian, 所以他的回答和我的Bible先生蠻類似的
都是近乎 "the failure of God's expectation and etc."
sin這字的根本意思似乎是 "failure to hit the mark."
and the topic as we were talking and eating was somehow, but not accidentally, brought into his proof-of-God theory.
He argued that all the reasoning methodology I have learned was principal to the God, the creator of everything because reasoning method I am using is
built upon the consistency rules, harmony, the tradition. When I am making an argument, I am already, unawarely, using the logics that is built upon the Christian world because the founder of the ability and everything that is around us is God.
Making an argument using rational thinking to challenge the existence of God and his credibility is as if one is trying to take the sword from the enemy's hand in hope it to become his own weapon.
(Principal to the God means that everything that happens, including I am being here answering and asking him questions, account for the existence of the God. )
God, according to Mr. M&M, is the founder of all these. One of the strongest argument he has made for me to challenge the existence of Christian's God and his Christian belief.
"If there's no one who is controlling all the harmony of the world, the universe, who is?" said he.
I threw him questions such as "how do you verify that the Christian's God is the God though?"
"how do you know that is someone, not something, in charge of controlling the harmony of everything though?"
I think the most fundamental presumption (such word I considered to be in an even earlier stage than assumption) M&M is making is
the existence of the God. I pointed that out and he answered me with wit and strong reasoning, "you can't make judgement without making any presumption."
"All your 'rational' thinking, your belief, is built upon what you have learned from the past," replied M&M.
Don't bother if you don't know understand what I said due to this specific blog I wrote is not well-written, full of grammatical mistakes, misspelling, wrong word usage, incomplete and discrete arguments, vague explanations, and etc.
but I just want to say that it's lucky to be a Christian...
or lucky for one who believes reverently in religions.
不過Christian的這個preassumption真他媽的囂張
"In order to ask me questions, you have to believe in Christianity first," said he.
當然不是照字面上的意思翻
聊這玩意的時候讓我想到佛教的禪和直指本心的那些 metaphysics,
我現在已經不知道自己再說什麼了
禪在M&M想法裡也是屬於他的神的範疇
畢竟根據我對禪粗淺的認識實在說不出太多東西
而當他問我說 "你是怎麼知道禪在說什麼",我就知道又掉進他那個大陷阱裡了
好厲害...
全站熱搜
留言列表
